question everything

                               ~ublog

about
feedback

write to me
Get Firefox
Ubaid Dhiyan's Facebook profile





Kiva - loans that change lives
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from ubaidd. Make your own badge here.
blogroll

[blogroll me]

syndicate
atom
rss
news
asiatimes
bbc
buzzflash
guardian
haaretz
nytimes
outlook
times
timesofindia
washingtonpost
politics/policy
gush-shalom
opendemocracy
pnac
pnac.info
policyreview
misc
assembler
badmash
explodingdog
harpersindex
fark
fictionpress
jargonfile
infidels
memoryhole
plagiarist
pynchon
snopes
talkreason
ubu
wikipedia
affiliates
other websites
@netfirms
@webshots
@geocities
@xanga
Rate Me on
BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?

ping weblogs
blogwise
globeofblogs
rice bowl journals

< ? indie blogrs # >
national geographic pod
Click this photograph for National Geographic's Photo of the Day
needful things
credits
blogger
blog*spot
blogmatrix
bravenet
enetation
extreme
google
sitemeter
Wednesday, July 23, 2003
ah... choice!
three reasons i'm using firebird to browse the web,
i) type ahead find, lets u jump through hyperlinks without using the mouse, highlighting the link text as you type it, u gotta use it to believe how fantastic this feature is
ii) tabbed browsing, instead of ten different windows you can have everything tabbed in one window
iii) it is fast and offers everything that IE does plus more

so what are u waiting for? go check it out.



Sunday, July 20, 2003
wmd not found
haha, this is real funny.

i'm not sure if u've noticed but tacitus seems to have gotten less objective and more invective. first there was the attack on islamic and/or iraqi culture citing the case of a little girl who'd been raped and then subjected to physical abuse from her own sick family members, latest is his diatribe about how islam is one of the "few movements, peoples, or ideologies that have in the course of history sought to destroy Western Civilization as such".
it's funny how newspapers twist the truth, the headlines convey something and the actual article says something entirely different. two cases in point, the first was an article in the san jose mercury news last week that spoke about a tape that had surfaced in baghdad, with saddam hussein allegedly urging a "holy war". the actual article did not mention anything about a holy war as such, saddam hussein urged the iraqis to "wage a jihad against the americans". "jihad" in this context was not related to religion at all, rather it was an exhortation for the iraqis to fight the people who'd toppled hussein. the second article that caught my attention was in the wall street journal, the headline said something akin to "iraqi scientists talk about attempt to create biological weapons", the article was actually about a failed attempt to use ricin, back in 1991 and the methods used even then were so crude the whole thing was scrapped before it even got off the ground. my point is, why do respected newspapers sensationalize the headline at the cost of credibility?