question everything

                               ~ublog

about
feedback

write to me
Get Firefox
Ubaid Dhiyan's Facebook profile





Kiva - loans that change lives
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from ubaidd. Make your own badge here.
blogroll

[blogroll me]

syndicate
atom
rss
news
asiatimes
bbc
buzzflash
guardian
haaretz
nytimes
outlook
times
timesofindia
washingtonpost
politics/policy
gush-shalom
opendemocracy
pnac
pnac.info
policyreview
misc
assembler
badmash
explodingdog
harpersindex
fark
fictionpress
jargonfile
infidels
memoryhole
plagiarist
pynchon
snopes
talkreason
ubu
wikipedia
affiliates
other websites
@netfirms
@webshots
@geocities
@xanga
Rate Me on
BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?

ping weblogs
blogwise
globeofblogs
rice bowl journals

< ? indie blogrs # >
national geographic pod
Click this photograph for National Geographic's Photo of the Day
needful things
credits
blogger
blog*spot
blogmatrix
bravenet
enetation
extreme
google
sitemeter
Friday, October 24, 2003
fighting for peace
Once during Mood I, IIT Bombay's* famed college festival (famed in India that is) I remember reading a graffiti that said 'Fighting for peace is like f*ing for virginity' and smiled. In true Orwellian fashion the Bush administration has repeatedly exhibited this twisted logic, and this latest one is simply astounding in its imbecility. In this October 4 article, the Tri-Valley Herald reports, (via Illruminations)
The Bush administration is proposing far-reaching changes to conservation policies that would allow hunters, circuses and the pet industry to kill, capture and import animals on the brink of extinction in other countries.

Giving Americans access to endangered animals, officials said, would both feed the gigantic U.S. demand for live animals, skins, parts and trophies, and generate profits that would allow poor nations to pay for conservation of the remaining animals and their habitats.

This and other proposals that pursue conservation through trade would, for example, open the door for American trophy hunters to kill the endangered straight-horned markhor in Pakistan; license the pet industry to import the blue fronted Amazon parrot from Argentina; permit the capture of endangered Asian elephants for U.S. circuses and zoos; and partially resume the international trade in African ivory. No U.S. endangered species would be affected.
Richly in the tradition of unnecessary wars, this also brings back to mind an article on logging and forest fires. By the administration of a President who wrote this (yes, I just can't let go, will you just read it?) we have these justifications, from here,
Responding to the rash of wildfires that have swept the West this summer, President Bush wants to ease restrictions on logging in national forests.

Bush, on the eve of a visit to a fire site in Oregon, late yesterday proposed changes to environmental laws to make it easier for timber companies to get approval to thin out federal forests and remove fire-prone dead trees and undergrowth.

"Needless red tape and lawsuits delay effective implementation of forest health projects," said a White House fact sheet on the initiative. "This year's crisis compels more timely decisions, greater efficiency and better results to reduce catastrophic wildfire threats to communities and the environment."
Amazingly enough, they have the gall to name it the 'Healthy Forests Initiative'.
This is also the administration that modified the Clean Air Act into something dirty and called it the 'Clear Skies Initiative'. George Orwell may not have imagined Newspeak would ever so completely apply to an American administration.

* Mood I(ndigo) is the annual college festival of IIT Bombay, one of the world's finest engineering schools, and a shining star of India's otherwise very broken education system



Monday, October 20, 2003
blogthought
They have .info, .biz, and .name, is it a little late to ask for .blog?

http://u.blog/ hmm, like the sound of that ;)




a bunch of morons
Israel is going ahead with its incomprehensible decision to 'take out' Arafat. About Sharon, and quoting him, the New York Times says,
Mr. Sharon's pattern, first as a general and then as a politician, has been to set seemingly audacious goals, or to employ seemingly audacious tactics like the use of warplanes against Palestinian targets, and then, over time, to accustom even his sharpest critics to them.

Speaking of removing Mr. Arafat as he addressed Parliament in Jerusalem on Monday, he said: "Our policy is becoming more and more conceivable to various international bodies. I am convinced our policy will succeed."

Mr. Sharon, who in a newspaper interview last week appeared to rule out exiling or killing Mr. Arafat, did not explain what measures Israel might take against him.

If exiling and killing are both out of question then what will they end up doing? Putting him under house arrest? Isn't that practically the situation right now anyway?

Meanwhile, Malaysia's premier makes a spectacularly stupid statement, and gets chided, but of course.