| question everything |
~ublog |
HOME |
|
|
about feedback
news politics/policy misc affiliates other websites Rate Me on national geographic pod needful things credits |
Friday, October 24, 2003
fighting for peace Once during Mood I, IIT Bombay's* famed college festival (famed in India that is) I remember reading a graffiti that said 'Fighting for peace is like f*ing for virginity' and smiled. In true Orwellian fashion the Bush administration has repeatedly exhibited this twisted logic, and this latest one is simply astounding in its imbecility. In this October 4 article, the Tri-Valley Herald reports, (via Illruminations) The Bush administration is proposing far-reaching changes to conservation policies that would allow hunters, circuses and the pet industry to kill, capture and import animals on the brink of extinction in other countries.Richly in the tradition of unnecessary wars, this also brings back to mind an article on logging and forest fires. By the administration of a President who wrote this (yes, I just can't let go, will you just read it?) we have these justifications, from here, Responding to the rash of wildfires that have swept the West this summer, President Bush wants to ease restrictions on logging in national forests.Amazingly enough, they have the gall to name it the 'Healthy Forests Initiative'. This is also the administration that modified the Clean Air Act into something dirty and called it the 'Clear Skies Initiative'. George Orwell may not have imagined Newspeak would ever so completely apply to an American administration. * Mood I(ndigo) is the annual college festival of IIT Bombay, one of the world's finest engineering schools, and a shining star of India's otherwise very broken education system Monday, October 20, 2003
blogthought They have .info, .biz, and .name, is it a little late to ask for .blog? http://u.blog/ hmm, like the sound of that ;)
a bunch of morons Israel is going ahead with its incomprehensible decision to 'take out' Arafat. About Sharon, and quoting him, the New York Times says, Mr. Sharon's pattern, first as a general and then as a politician, has been to set seemingly audacious goals, or to employ seemingly audacious tactics like the use of warplanes against Palestinian targets, and then, over time, to accustom even his sharpest critics to them. If exiling and killing are both out of question then what will they end up doing? Putting him under house arrest? Isn't that practically the situation right now anyway? Meanwhile, Malaysia's premier makes a spectacularly stupid statement, and gets chided, but of course. |
|
|